A pundit for the United States Men’s National Team (USMNT) has made a concerning injury allegation regarding Celtic’s Cameron Carter-Vickers.

A pundit for the United States Men’s National Team (USMNT) has made a concerning injury allegation regarding Celtic’s Cameron Carter-Vickers. In the Concacaf Nations League semi-final on Thursday, the USMNT was humiliated, and Celtic defender Cameron Carter-Vickers

 

 


 

observed the match from the sideline. Lowley Panama, who have previously caused the United States problems, scored a goal in the 94th minute through Cecilio Waterman. Waterman then jumped over the advertising board to celebrate with CBS pundit and legendary striker, Thierry Henry. Mauricio Pochettino’s team is currently facing Canada in a third-place play-off on Sunday evening,

 

 

 

 

 

as the 2026 World Cup is rapidly approaching and the United States is preparing to co-host one of the sport’s most significant events alongside Mexico and Canada. Carter-Vickers will likely be pleased that he was on the bench for the Panama encounter, as Crystal Palace’s Chris Richards and Tim Ream of Charlotte in the MLS were able to play ahead of the Celtic man.

 

 

 

 

Auston Trusty has already been sidelined due to injury, and he was also absent for Celtic’s loss to Rangers prior to the international break.According to an American commentator, Cameron Carter-Vickers has sustained an injury. Carter-Vickers’ position on the substitute for the Panama match would not have come as a surprise to Celtic fans, as he has not consistently been a regular for his country.

 

 

 

 

However, three former players were deliberating on CBS Sports regarding the modifications they would implement to the USMNT XI in anticipation of the Canada game. Jimmy Conrad, a former defender, was questioned about the modifications he would make to the position of centre-back. Although he downplayed Carter-

 

 

 

 

Vickers, he did mention that he was aware of the Celtic player’s injury. Charlie Davies enquired, “Who would you select to play at centre back?” “For an extended period of time, you have investigated these individuals.” “Considering the initial game and its outcome.” In light of the athletes who participated in this camp. Who do you believe would provide this team with the most favourable opportunity to maintain a spotless record? Conrad replied,

 

 

 

 

“So, the two center-backs in the back four.” I believe that (Mark) McKenzie will receive a run-out and should. “I remain undecided regarding Chris Richards.” I am still anticipating that he will have a full 90 minutes, but we are unable to observe it. This error is consistent. We have not been explicitly penalised for it; however, are we supposed to wait until the World Cup to receive retribution in a significant game?

 

 

 

 

“However, I do not necessarily desire to observe additional Tim Ream, as we are aware of his capabilities.” It is almost as if we are aware of the strengths he possesses; is there another more capable centre-back pairing that could benefit from an opportunity to perform well and share some minutes?

 

 

 

 

“Given the resources at our disposal.” It appears that Cameron Carter-Vickers may be experiencing a minor issue, such as a niggle or injury. That would render him ineligible. Richards and McKenzie are the only remaining options. It is disheartening, as I had anticipated that we would have had additional alternatives.







Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*