Alan Shearer discusses whether he believes Arsenal defender William Saliba genuinely fouled Joao Pedro for Brighton’s penalty.

Following Liverpool’s own 2-2 draw with Manchester United, Arsenal supporters may be feeling even more frustrated about their draw against Brighton & Hove Albion on Saturday.

 

Despite the fact that Arsenal had a challenging fixture against Brighton, Mikel Arteta’s team was unable to capitalize on Liverpool’s dropped points once more.


 

 

Nevertheless, Brighton has not been at their most effective in recent times, and it was believed that the host team was vulnerable if Arsenal had executed their strategy correctly.

 

 

 

Anthony Taylor determined that Saliba had impeded the Brazilian striker, who was in agony, as the two players engaged in a head-to-head competition for the ball in the box. Alan Shearer contends that William Saliba did in fact foul Joao Pedro during the penalty ruling.

 

 

 

Nevertheless, Alan Shearer provided his assessment of the situation during an interview with Gary Lineker on the ‘The Rest is Football’ podcast. Since the incident, Lineker has already expressed his belief that it was not a penalty. However, the Gunners’ performance was dismal, particularly in the second half, following Ethan Nwaneri’s spectacular opener.

 

 

Furthermore, Arsenal was unable to maintain their 1-0 advantage as a result of a contentious penalty decision, which determined that William Saliba had fouled Joao Pedro.

 

 

Nevertheless, Shearer was not entirely persuaded that Taylor had made a significant error, arguing that Saliba’s challenge was still mistimed, regardless of whether it was delivered with his head. Shearer stated,

 

 

 

“I have never encountered that situation either. However, I would not be as resilient as you were on Match of the Day last evening, as I would advise you that it is an accident.”

 

 

 

“However, if an individual intentionally pursues the ball and improperly executes a tackle, resulting in the individual’s elimination, the action is considered a penalty.” So, what is the distinction? Lineker replied, “If you look at it in extremely slow motion, and let’s pretend that Saliba did not head the ball, but he clearly did.”

 

 

He directed it prior to making contact with the participant. “Typically, in a box tackle, if a player gets a toe in and removes it, and then flicks the opponent’s ankle, the referee will say, ‘No, he got the ball.'”

 

 

“That serves as an answer to your inquiry.” However, when observed in slow motion, it is significantly different from when observed at normal speed. You would never have given if you were operating at a normal pace.

 

 

“I believe the penalty has been imposed on him.” I doubt that he could even perceive it accurately. I believe he administered the penalty because Joao Pedro collapsed in a hysterical state. Is it advisable to penalize him for this behavior?







Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*