Celtic F.C. player Daizen Maeda explains his transfer stance towards West Ham United and Crystal Palace interest to sign him this summer

For Celtic, the summer transfer window is expected to be active.

It is possible to contend that Celtic’s most advantageous business strategy is to retain their star player, Daizen Maeda.

The 27-year-old has achieved the most impressive season of his career, scoring four Champions League goals and a total of 33.

West Ham United, Crystal Palace, and Leeds United are among the Premier League clubs that are currently expressing interest in his services.

The problem Celtic face is that Premier League money is a powerful force, as evidenced by the £25 million transfer of Matt O’Riley to Brighton last summer.

Therefore, Celtic Park’s ruling elite will be compelled to grant access and engage in dialogue if those interested parties contribute funds.

The transfer interest of Crystal Palace and West Ham United in Celtic forward Daizen Maeda
Caught Offside has reported that Celtic is “aware” of their player’s “stock rising,” and that five English clubs have entered the competition for Maeda’s services.

Fulham, Brentford, Crystal Palace, West Ham United, and Leeds United are the teams that have been suggested as being interested in the Japan international.

It has been reported that Celtic have assigned a price tag of “£25 million” to their star player, and this valuation has not deterred Premier League teams.

Additionally, Caught Offside implies that the Premier League teams’ interest in the player could potentially persuade him to relocate to England.

Maeda’s Celtic season in numerical terms
One of the most significant storylines from Celtic’s summer window and a significant advantage for the upcoming campaign would be the retention of Maeda.
It is important to recall that Celtic made strides in the Champions League this season. Therefore, if they intend to maintain this trajectory, Maeda must remain.

Celtic is already in the process of recruiting a striker in the wake of Kyogo Furuhashi’s departure in January; therefore, it is unnecessary to introduce an additional issue.