Chris Sutton has weighed in on the stoppage-time debate after Celtic’s dramatic comeback at Rugby Park, dismissing complaints about the seven added minutes and suggesting the figure was, if anything, conservative.
The former Celtic striker took to X shortly after full-time, making it clear he had little patience for the criticism surrounding the late winner.
He argued that, considering the lengthy treatment for injured players, multiple substitutions and other delays, seven minutes was hardly excessive — hinting that accusations of unfairness smacked of “sour grapes” and jealousy.
His comments reflect what many supporters observed during a stop-start second half.
There were repeated breaks for medical attention, numerous changes from both sides and two Celtic goals before stoppage time was even signalled.
Under the Laws of the Game, referees must account for time lost due to injuries, substitutions and other interruptions, with the number shown by the fourth official representing only the minimum to be played. Viewed through that lens, seven minutes appears well within reason.
Celtic made the most of that period. Julián Araujo struck in the 97th minute to seal a thrilling 3-2 victory, sparking wild celebrations among the travelling support and reinforcing the club’s growing reputation for late drama.
For many, the focus on added time overlooks the bigger picture. Celtic’s increased tempo after the break, proactive tactical adjustments and relentless attacking pressure had already shifted momentum long before the clock hit 90.
Sutton’s stance echoes a widely held view among fans: the added minutes did not hand Celtic the win — their determination and sustained push did.
As for the opposing frustration, some may see it as an emotional response to surrendering a strong half-time position rather than evidence of injustice.
Leave a Reply