Currently, three hypotheses have been put forth regarding Arsenal’s decision to pursue Aston Villa striker Ollie Watkins.

Currently, three hypotheses have been put forth regarding Arsenal’s decision to pursue Aston Villa striker Ollie Watkins.

This week, Arsenal executed a noteworthy transaction by submitting a bid for Ollie Watkins from Aston Villa. On Wednesday, Arsenal submitted a substantial financial proposal for Watkins; however, their offer for the Aston Villa striker was subsequently declined.

This was a rather left-field move so close to the conclusion of the transfer window, and there’s been a lot of speculation about what Arsenal are going to do next and why this bid was even made. Arsenal must have been acutely aware that submitting a proposal for a rival’s premier player at this late stage was, to put it mildly, a rather ambitious

In a discussion on the TalkSPORT Transfer Notebook Podcast, Alex Crook has conveyed insights regarding Arsenal’s offer for Watkins. The journalist posits that there are three prevailing hypotheses regarding Arsenal’s pursuit of Watkins.Three hypotheses regarding Arsenal’s pursuit of Ollie Watkins.

Crook conveyed the information he has received regarding Watkins and Arsenal’s proposal. The journalist asserts that there are three prevailing hypotheses regarding the situation, one of which posits that Arsenal’s offer was made merely to placate their supporters. An alternative hypothesis posits that Arsenal was compelled to submit this bid at such a late stage due to the imminent completion of Jhon Duran’s transfer.

According to Crook, there exist three prevailing perspectives on this matter. One viewpoint posits that Arsenal endeavoured to placate their supporters by pursuing a player they recognised they had a limited likelihood of acquiring, thereby demonstrating their engagement in the transfer market.

The second point is that they needed to initiate their pursuit of Watkins at that particular moment, as they were aware of the growing interest from Saudi Arabia in Jhon Duran. Consequently, Arsenal aimed to present Aston Villa with a decision: rather than selling Duran, they could opt to sell Watkins to them instead.

“The third theory presented to me this morning.” Although Villa expressed their agitation regarding Arsenal’s interest, it appears they were nonetheless content for this narrative to circulate, thereby prompting the Saudis to intensify their interest in Duran. “I am confident that the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

“The situation involving Jhon Duran bears resemblance to Ivan Toney’s transfer to Saudi Arabia. Although the theory suggesting that Villa is attempting to disseminate the narrative concerning Watkins remains unverified, it is a proposition that possesses considerable plausibility. Indeed, when engaging with the Saudi Pro League, one frequently encounters transfers that may alter unexpectedly, especially in the case of strikers.

It is important to note that Al-Nassr was considering the acquisition of Victor Boniface while simultaneously pursuing Duran. Consequently, Aston Villa needed to instill a sense of urgency into this transaction to guarantee its successful completion. A comparable incident occurred during the summer involving another striker from the Premier League.