Gary Lineker advocates for a modification of the VAR regulations following inquiries regarding the contentious decision involving Arsenal.
It is reasonable to assert that Mikel Arteta and the supporters of Arsenal have experienced considerable frustration regarding the decisions rendered by both VAR and the referees of the Premier League this season.
Arsenal has accumulated a greater number of red cards than any other team in England’s Premier League this season, equaling the total received by the remaining teams in the current top four combined. Certainly, the most recent development in that narrative was the red card issued to Myles Lewis-Skelly during Arsenal’s recent 1-0 victory against Wolverhampton Wanderers.
Fortunately, that decision was rescinded, allowing Myles Lewis-Skelly to excel in the match against Manchester City, a contest from which he would have been absent due to suspension. It presently appears that the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system is not being utilized to its fullest potential, as there remain an excessive number of subjective decisions.
Gary Lineker advocates for the implementation of a Video Assistant Referee (VAR) appeal system following… Myles Lewis-Skelly received a red card. In this context, Gary Lineker has proposed a modification to the VAR regulations during his discussion on the podcast ‘
The Rest Is Football’ alongside Alan Shearer. Lineker suggested the implementation of a ‘appeal system’ and was subsequently inquired about its potential functionality in the context of Lewis-Skelly’s dismissal during the match against Wolves. Lineker remarked, “I find myself nearly fatigued by the necessity of reiterating this point.” An appeal system must be established.
“This significantly diminishes the extent of interference that the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) will exert, as its utilization will be initiated solely by the captain or coach, or another designated individual.”
“However, I believe it is inevitable that this will occur at some point.” It is imperative that it be addressed, as the current situation is merely laborious. Shearer subsequently inquired,
“What is the procedure regarding your appeal system?” Furthermore, if one were to revisit the incident involving the red card issued to Arsenal during the match against Wolverhampton Wanderers…What occurs when one expresses, “Indeed, I am contesting that system, specifically VAR, that challenge, or that tackle, or that decision”?
The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) supported the referee’s judgment and concurred with his decision. And you, but you as a team, you’ve still got that one appeal or however many you’ve got, and you say, yes, I’m appealing that decision.” Lineker stated, “Indeed, one may contest that decision, which would subsequently be reviewed by
VAR; moreover, it is likely more advantageous for the referee to also consult a monitor.” “If he has made a hasty error, I genuinely believe that upon reviewing it in slow motion, he would have reconsidered his decision. Nevertheless, inaccuracies will still occur.”
Norwegian organizations are voting to abolish VAR for a similar rationale. Notably, the pair were posed a query in light of the recent decision by clubs in Norway’s premier league to eliminate VAR, contending that it interrupts the rhythm of the game.
The Football Association of Norway has publicly supported the use of VAR in that instance, with a determination regarding the continuation or discontinuation of the system anticipated in March. Certainly, Arsenal supporters may humorously propose that they would have frequently exhausted their appeals this season, given the extent of their misfortune.
Declan Rice’s red card faced scrutiny earlier in the season, as did Leandro Trossard’s second yellow card issued during the match against Manchester City. This is undoubtedly a compelling debate, and regardless of one’s position, it appears that modifications are necessary to optimize the system, which has proven to be expensive.
Leave a Reply