Jamie Carragher elucidates the distinction between Kevin De Bruyne’s circumstances at Manchester City and Mo Salah’s at Liverpool. Kevin De Bruyne’s tenure at Manchester City is quickly approaching its conclusion.
The Belgian sensation has been with the Premier League champions for the past decade, winning all of his games at the Etihad Stadium. He is now seeking to further his success by winning the FA Cup and FIFA Club World Cup in the upcoming months. Kevin De Bruyne’s performance against Crystal Palace demonstrated his dedication to this cause, despite the fact that he had previously expressed interest in a transfer to the Chicago Fire.
Despite the likelihood of the 33-year-old remaining in Manchester beyond this season, De Bruyne recently reported that Manchester City did not extend him an extension. This may have come as a surprise to some Manchester United supporters; however, Jamie Carragher has now disclosed that he comprehends the reasoning behind Man City’s decision to pursue this course of action with the veteran player.
Jamie Carragher comprehends the rationale behind the exclusion of Kevin De Bruyne from a new contract. The news headlines were dominated by the contract circumstances of Virgil van Dijk and Mohamed Salah at Liverpool, as well as De Bruyne’s situation at Man City, as the summer transfer window approached. The Merseyside club recently extended the contracts of the duo for an additional two years,
which has prompted numerous City supporters to question why the same was not done for De Bruyne. During the most recent episode of Stick To Football, Jamie Carragher elucidated the reasons for the disparity between the two scenarios. In fact, the Sky Sports pundit concurs with the Manchester club’s perspective. “From City’s perspective, Salah and Van Dijk are comparable in terms of their age, and they compete on a weekly basis,” Carragher stated.
“You are aware that you will receive 40 to 50 games per season when you are paying them a substantial sum.” Regrettably, Kevin De Bruyne has been unsuccessful in recent years. Listen, he is one of my favourites. I have the utmost respect for him; however, I can comprehend the club’s decision to pay him four hundred thousand dollars per week for a player who is only participating in half of the games.
The fitness issues that De Bruyne has experienced have significantly impacted his productivity this season, which would have been a contributing factor in City’s decision not to extend his contract.Kevin De Bruyne’s injury history at Manchester City De Bruyne has endured numerous severe injuries over the past two seasons; however, the current campaign has not been his most dismal, as he has participated in 35 games.
De Bruyne’s recent issues with his fitness were underscored during the 2023/24 season, as the midfielder only participated in 26 matches due to a series of setbacks. These challenges are expected to worsen as the player ages. De Bruyne is widely regarded as the most exceptional player to have ever represented Manchester City; however, all excellent things must eventually come to an end.
The Manchester club would have faced a difficult decision to release the Belgian superstar; however, it is the correct one, particularly if Man City sign Florian Wirtz as the midfielder’s replacement. Games were missed due to injury. Hamstring injury (24/25) 12. Stomach issue (23/24) 1. Groin strain (23/24) 2. Fitness concern (23/24) 3. Hamstring injury (23/24) 30 Burn on the foot (22/23) 3
Leave a Reply