Jamie Carragher offers a clue as to the straightforward reason Liverpool declined: Amorim, Ruben

Jamie Carragher suggests that Liverpool’s rejection of Ruben Amorim was straightforward. Jamie

Carragher maintains that Liverpool’s decision not to pursue Ruben Amorim was due to their ambition to play with a back four. The Portuguese coach is one of the most highly-regarded managers in Europe, and Manchester United has made the decision to hire him as Erik ten Hag’s successor. Liverpool contemplated pursuing the 39-year-old when they were in search of a replacement for Jurgen Klopp several months ago.The German had been in charge for nearly nine years, and his philosophy has become ingrained in the club, with the academy mirroring the first-team. Klopp employed a back four, and Liverpool was hesitant to alter their complete formation, as they were aware that Amorim was committed to employing three players in defence. In the Telegraph, Carragher expressed his suspicion that Liverpool’s preference for Slot over Amorim last summer was due to the Dutchman’s preference for the more conventional four-man defence, which made the transition simpler for the squad he inherited. Jurgen Klopp implemented a policy of replicating the first team’s playing manner at the academy level to guarantee that the players who advanced were acquainted with the game. Early in his managerial tenure, Amorim has achieved significant success as a result of his formation and style. He terminated Sporting’s 19-year quest for a league title and has since accrued a plethora of accolades. Despite Amorim’s departure from his position in a week, the Lisbon team remains at the summit of the table.

Despite the fact that Liverpool would not have been well-suited to a back three due to their personnel, United could benefit from altering their defensive structure. Gary Neville is among those who believe that tweaking could be a solution to their subpar start. He stated, “I have been contemplating for several months that United may be more well-suited to a three-man defence, given the players they possess.” It is possible that this could occur due to the absence of a centre-back pairing and the fact that the full-backs appear to be more effective in the offensive zone than they are in the defensive zone. “Perhaps that would provide them with a degree of comfort, as it would provide them with an additional body at the back and place them in a system that provides them with additional support.” I have contemplated that for several months; however, I am uncertain as to whether it is the appropriate course of action.