Simon Jordan rebukes the Rangers for the manner in which Celtic fans were treated following the controversy surrounding the commentator.

Simon Jordan rebukes the Rangers for the manner in which Celtic fans were treated following the controversy surrounding the commentator. Glasgow is never without its share of drama, regardless of whether Celtic and Rangers have concluded their seasons.

 

 

 

 

Last season, Celtic secured the Premiership title by a margin of 17 points. On trophy day, James Forrest scored a record-breaking goal to secure a point against St Mirren. Rangers’ 2-2 draw at Hibernian did not affect the first or second positions in terms of significance, as the final day results for the 2024/25 campaign were of no consequence.

 

 

 

 

 

Barry Ferguson’s penultimate game as interim manager and the controversy surrounding a Nico Raskin goal that was not awarded were among the numerous headlines that emerged from the match at Easter Road. Simon Jordan offered some intriguing perspectives on the incident, including the inclusion of Celtic’s name.

 

 

 

 

Subsequently, there was additional controversy. What is the source of the controversy at the Rangers? The decision not to award Raskin’s goal, which had crossed the line, was deemed “corrupt” by former defender John Brown, who then worked for Rangers TV. Rangers have since been fined ‘£3k’ by the SFA for their comments. It is important to note that Scotland does not have goal line technology,

 

 

 

and VAR was not involved in the incident. Jordan has expressed his dissatisfaction with Brown’s remarks during an interview with talkSPORT.Jordan stated, “If I were a member of the Rangers, I would have a more positive attitude towards John Brown and less of a negative attitude towards the team I would be watching.” “You twerp, pack it in,”

 

 

 

I would say. Why would you make that assertion? He is unable to assert that it is corrupt. He is unaware that it is corrupt. ‘What an abhorrent, scandalous, and appalling decision’ is a statement that he is capable of making. He is unable to use the term “corrupt” because he is unaware of its corruption. The adjudicator may file a complaint against him, asserting,

 

 

 

 

“Wait a minute, that is defamation.” The final two Glasgow derby games of the season were played at Celtic Park and Ibrox, with away supporters returning to their respective venues. In 2018, Rangers threw their toys out of the pram and refused to allow Celtic supporters into Ibrox. Scotland’s most successful club subsequently followed suit.

 

 

 

 

Jordan again criticised Rangers after they informed the SFA that they would “monitor closely” any fines imposed on other club commentators for the same incident. The former owner of Crystal Palace claimed that the Scottish football hierarchy has granted them “dispensation” for the conduct of their supporters, as well as the

 

 

 

 

“silly dispute” regarding Celtic fans’ denied entry to Ibrox.Rangers stated that they would carefully monitor the SFA to guarantee that it is implemented uniformly. “I believe that is arrogant, is it not?” “Ultimately, you are aware that your acquaintance made an error.” It is unjustifiable. You are well aware that your grievance and issue are not with the SFA,

 

 

 

and you are also aware that the SFA frequently grant you dispensation due to the behaviour of your supporters and the attitude they have exhibited over the years. “You were permitted to prohibit football fans from entering stadiums for the past five years due to a frivolous dispute with Celtic regarding who causes the most offence within their facilities.” Consequently, it is time to place it away.