Stephen Robinson is annoyed with Sky Sports regarding the St Mirren “penalty” claim, stating that “The Celtic bench knew.”

Stephen Robinson expressed his dissatisfaction with Sky Sports regarding the St Mirren “penalty” claim, stating that ”

The Celtic bench knew.” Celtic extended their lead at the summit of the Scottish Premiership with a comprehensive victory over St Mirren. The Bhoys ultimately defeated St Mirren 5-2 at the SMISA Stadium, despite the Buddies’ valiant efforts to recover from two consecutive deficits.

Brendan Rodgers’ second-half substitutions resulted in Celtic’s reversal of fortune, as Hyunjun Yang scored a late brace, further highlighting the South Korean’s remarkable effect as a cameo player. Nevertheless, Stephen Robinson, the manager of St Mirren, expressed his dissatisfaction with the three points in his post-match interview with Sky Sports, citing a “penalty” that his team was not awarded. Robinson stated,

“We can observe two goals at the conclusion, but not in terms of performance.” It is evident that Celtic may have been slightly pleased by the gesture; however, we must improve our defence of both goals, regardless of the circumstances that led to their scoring. “Therefore, it is impossible to justify that.” I believed that the level of performance was exceptionally excellent. We did not remain passive.

Celtic was selected. Unfortunately, we were unable to capitalise on numerous opportunities to take the ball away from them, and as a result, teams punished us. Stephen Robinson asserts that the Celtic dugout was aware that St Mirren should have been awarded a penalty. A challenge was made by Alistair Johnston on a St Mirren assailant with a few minutes remaining, and the score was 3-2.

Reporter: “What did you say to the fourth official?” “Because I observed you conversing with him.” Robinson: “Listen, events occur at an accelerated pace; that is the purpose of VAR.” He was in excellent health; the fourth official was particularly impressive. He informed me that it was currently under review.

We were certain that we would receive the penalty; however, this was not the case. Reporter: “Is it not evident that that is being verified?” If you believe it is a penalty, it is not my opinion; it is yours. Surely you believe it is a penalty; why would they not grant it? Robinson: “You are expressing it because it is also your opinion.”