The President of La Liga has officially announced the intention to de-register Dani Olmo. “We have requested the implementation of a precautionary measure.”
The registration of Dani Olmo emerged as a significant topic of discussion in anticipation of Barcelona’s inaugural match of 2025, as La Liga declined to issue the player’s authorisation to participate due to Barcelona’s failure to meet the stipulated deadline.
The circumstances did not present a favourable depiction of Joan Laporta’s administration; however, the club president ultimately succeeded in securing the registration of Olmo through the implementation of a precautionary measure authorised by the CSDL.
Aporia the circumstances surrounding the player’s registration during a recent media engagement, thereby clarifying the events that transpired. However, the status of his registration remains ambiguous, as La Liga is actively seeking to invalidate it.
Tena’s the matter. In a recent address to the media, La Liga President Javier Tebas expressed his disapproval regarding the registration controversy surrounding Dani Olmo, specifically criticising the intervention of the CSD that allowed Barcelona to register the player. “Government intervention does not convey a favourable impression.”
“However, we have adhered to the principles of both fair play and the regulations of the federation,” he stated, justifying La Liga’s stance. Expounding upon the decision of the CSD to grant registration to both athletes, Tebas articulated that the governing body was not adequately informed regarding the pertinent regulations on the matter.
“On January 3, they exhibited fair play; however, we subsequently informed them that this was not permissible, as the player had already been deregistered on the 31st and was therefore ineligible to obtain a new licence,” he elaborated.
He subsequently remarked, “What are the responsibilities of the monitoring commission?” Examine the current circumstances, as FC Barcelona had previously submitted a letter, yet their request for a licence had already been declined.
“There is no longer any remaining.” Ultimately, Tebas affirmed that he had submitted a request for a new precautionary measure aimed at nullifying Olmo’s registration, stating, “We have submitted an appeal to the CSD.” We have requested a precautionary measure to revoke Olmo’s registration. A precautionary measure that nullifies the preceding precautionary measure.
Leave a Reply