‘They can’t treat me that way’ – Four Liverpool players frozen out as Jurgen Klopp shows his ruthless side.

And as everyone, especially the manager, is aware, it can be extremely difficult for me to not be playing, especially after having been the club’s captain for such an extended period of time. particularly so in light of the fact that England is vital to me. The Euros will soon commence.

The club was subsequently contacted by Al Ettifaq to inquire about the likelihood of my visit. The club did not react negatively once more.

“At that moment, I wondered if the club and its manager no longer desired my services or did not value my contributions as highly.” I possessed foresight that the moment would inevitably occur. It certainly would not be today, in my judgment. I am obligated to recognize that.

“I maintain outstanding relationships with both Jurgen and the club’s owners.” That is something that will never cease. Collectively, we have achieved remarkable feats throughout the past twelve years. Nonetheless, I found it challenging to embrace it simultaneously.

“Now we want you to stay,” one of those individuals would have said, and we would not be conversing. I am subsequently required to contemplate my forthcoming career progression.”That is not to say they forcibly removed me from the club; however, I never got the impression that the club or anyone else wanted me to remain.”

Klopp was not the only one to hold this view; Brazilian forward Roberto Firmino informed him he would be departing Liverpool in March 2023, after joining Al-Ahli in Saudi Arabia after his contract expired last summer.

In contrast, the forward recounts in his recently released autobiography, Si Senor, how he had been optimistic in the past regarding a new contract, but that communication between his representatives and the club had been “muddled” and “sluggish.”

Additionally, he stated at the start of 2023, “The boss was avoiding me,” due to the limited playing time and the absence of an explanation that, at the very least, could have been provided.

He would later declare himself satisfied that his manager refrained from making any effort to persuade him to remain with the club following his declaration to Klopp that he would not be signing a new contract. He maintained that a “difference in understanding” existed regarding the value he could bring to Liverpool.While it is more accurate to say that Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain joined Besiktas on a free transfer in the summer due to his limited playing time at Anfield, both Henderson and Firmino at least engaged in dialogue with Klopp.

Even though he understood why he wasn’t playing as frequently, the midfielder was surprised that the club hadn’t yet discussed his future plans until he discovered that his departure would be announced in a formal club statement.

Oxlade-Chamberlain stated to The Athletic, “In January, I was gaining some momentum; I scored at Brentford, but then we suffered a disappointing loss at Brighton (3-0, battered), and that was it for me.” And that was the extent of my acquisition.”

“I persisted, maintained composure, and exerted every effort to ensure that I was prepared, but in the end, the manager’s decision was somewhat arbitrary and contrary to my initial intentions. “For the remainder of the season, I was out of the squad, training with the group before returning to train alone on match days.”He would later declare himself satisfied that his manager refrained from making any effort to persuade him to remain with the club following his declaration to Klopp that he would not be signing a new contract. He maintained that a “difference in understanding” existed regarding the value he could bring to Liverpool.

While it is more accurate to say that Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain joined Besiktas on a free transfer in the summer due to his limited playing time at Anfield, both Henderson and Firmino at least engaged in dialogue with Klopp.

Even though he understood why he wasn’t playing as frequently, the midfielder was surprised that the club hadn’t yet discussed his future plans until he discovered that his departure would be announced in a formal club statement.Oxlade-Chamberlain stated to The Athletic, “In January, I was gaining some momentum; I scored at Brentford, but then we suffered a disappointing loss at Brighton (3-0, battered), and that was it for me.” And that was the extent of my acquisition.”

“I persisted, maintained composure, and exerted every effort to ensure that I was prepared, but in the end, the manager’s decision was somewhat arbitrary and contrary to my initial intentions. “For the remainder of the season, I was out of the squad, training with the group before returning to train alone on match days.”

“You likely desire an explanation for that because it causes you to wonder, ‘What else can I do in this situation?'” It is my understanding that some of the younger athletes were given opportunities to participate, thereby preparing them for future endeavors.

“Additionally, it was never stated explicitly that you would not be issued a new contract.” Nevertheless, I could see the image.I was duly informed three days prior to the Aston Villa match that they were to release an announcement which stated, “We would like to inform you, Milly, Bobby, and Naby of the following: Your departure.”

And I replied, “All right, then. “Thank you.” However, nothing official existed beforehand. Certain items are expected to be disclosed, regardless of their quality (good, bad, or otherwise); such is the nature of the game. The absence of communication was somewhat unanticipated.

However, such is football; Oxlade-Chamberlain is well aware that players eventually retire, are replaced, or are transferred; such is the way of life.

He made the following remark: “As I continue to play the game, I come to the realization that, in the grand scheme of things, you are merely one entity; many more people will have had incredible experiences after us, just as there were many more before us.”

“In the end, the club is greater than any individual playing member.” There are occasionally larger animals to fry. Nothing negative could be said about my time there; in fact, it did not conclude badly.”The aforementioned three players won every conceivable award during their time at the Reds. While they may not have been Klopp’s favorite players towards the end of their Anfield careers and may not have been involved as frequently as they had desired, they remained members of his first team squad.

The players whose narratives Klopp effectively halted at Anfield, at times omitting them from his first team and signaling their lack of desire, regard their experiences as devoid of significance. Although it might seem severe and ruthless, it has always been, is, and will continue to be an intrinsic aspect of the game.

In October 2015, when Jurgen Klopp assumed the managerial position of Liverpool, Mario Balotelli was on a miserable loan at AC Milan, following an equally disastrous inaugural season at Anfield.

He informed his colleagues prior to his return to the Reds for preseason training at the start of the 2016–17 season that he intended to revive his Liverpool career by impressing the German. Klopp, on the other hand, had changed his opinion about the Italian long before that moment.In July, Klopp stated to the media, “I am able to discuss Mario, as that individual is self-evident. Since arriving here, I’ve heard much spoken about him.

“I cannot speak otherwise of him since his return; he has always been a respectable individual. It’s not as if he returned and declared, “Who is the boss? I am the boss; I apologize, but it’s you.” That has in no way occurred.

“He has arrived, and we shall make every effort to ensure that he is physically fit. “Everything is in order and has been proceeding smoothly.”

“Thereafter, Mario will not find himself in this situation; I’ve discussed this with him.” He should not be competing with four or five other players for one or two places at this juncture of his career.

“We desire Mario to regain his form prior to his injury.” His skill is beyond reproach; during heading, crossing, and other drill practices, he has consistently demonstrated world-class performance.

“However, it is indisputable that a resolution is required; he has no right to be engaged in such a struggle with other players over a single position at this time.”Balotelli was left behind in Liverpool for the preseason tour of the United States, having been left out of all squads for prior friendlies and compelled to train with the Under-18s. Eventually, on the transfer deadline in August, he would agree to a free transfer to Nice.

A few days after the news broke that Mario Balotelli would be joining France, his agent, Mino Raiola, criticized Jurgen Klopp’s management of the Italian forward.

Raiola stated to Gazzetta dello Sport, “Ultimately, Liverpool’s leadership acknowledged Klopp’s error in assigning Balotelli to reserve training.”

“I do not intend to pass judgment on his coaching abilities, despite my personal disapproval, but he neglected to acknowledge that Mario Balotelli is, above all else, a human being.

Mario has demonstrated outstanding performance. Working out independently never caused him any discontent. It would be an insult to say that Klopp was in the wrong; he was completely depraved.Balotelli would eventually discuss his virtually nonexistent relationship with Klopp the following month.

At the moment, Balotelli told Italian media, “Neither Klopp nor I are acquainted with the other.”One conversation took place with him upon my return to Liverpool fifteen days ago.

“He advised me to seek alternative accommodations and stated that while it was possible for me to remain, it would not be his first choice.

“I would be able to return if I performed well in games, but I said my goodbyes, expressed my gratitude, and informed you that we would not be reuniting.”

Balotelli, in addition to Mamadou Sakho, who was returned from the aforementioned preseason tour of the United States, would not be the sole player “relegated to the reserves” during May 2016.He would rejoin the Reds once his loan had expired, remaining there until September 2017, at which point he concluded a permanent £26 million transfer to Palace. Liverpool reneged on their initial £30 million offer for the defender, which the Eagles attempted to acquire for the fourth time during the summer, so desperate were they to secure the Frenchman’s permanent departure.

Although in distinct circumstances compared to the aforementioned duo, Klopp would similarly conclude that Lazar Markovic did not align well with his vision.

The Serbian was on loan at Fenerbahce when Klopp assumed management at Anfield; however, a season-ending injury in February 2016 prevented him from performing. Following his recovery and return to Liverpool, he would participate in preseason matches before departing on loan to Sporting Lisbon at the conclusion of August.

He was loaned to Hull City subsequent to his midseason return, as his prospects at Anfield continued to elude him. Klopp affirmed he was available to depart following his participation in a preseason friendly against Tranmere Rovers in the summer of 2017. However, he was subsequently omitted from the traveling squad for the tour of Hong Kong.When led by Klopp, several players were largely disregarded: Jon Flanagan in 2017–18, Ben Davies in 2020–21, Jose Enrique and Steven Caulker in 2015–16, and Jon Flanagan in 2017–18.

Despite the dissatisfaction that Oxlade-Chamberlain, Firmino, and Henderson may have felt regarding the conclusion of their Reds campaigns, at least they parted ways with every conceivable winner’s medal. As the aforementioned players attest, the previous triumvirate hailing from Liverpool were among the fortunate cases.