Hearing Date Set: The SFA has filed charges against Brendan Rodgers! The main reason why the Scottish Football Association(SFA) is lowering its heads at Celtic Fc! Will Rodgers be penalize? - soocer442
Connect with us

Celtic

Hearing Date Set: The SFA has filed charges against Brendan Rodgers! The main reason why the Scottish Football Association(SFA) is lowering its heads at Celtic Fc! Will Rodgers be penalize?

Published

on

So, the SFA turned down Celtic’s appeal about Yang Hyun-Jun’s red card yesterday, which shocked and upset no one more than the Celtic board.

In other words, they laughed out loud.

The SFA has a two-step plan to make sure Celtic are punished severely for what happened at Tynecastle last Sunday. This is the first step.

Step two will probably be making sure Brendan Rodgers gets a touchline for telling the truth about John Beaton in the press meeting after the game.

He’s so rude!

Hearing Date Set: The SFA has filed charges against Brendan Rodgers! The main reason why the Scottish Football Association(SFA) is lowering its heads at Celtic! Will Rodgers be penalize?

He was clearly cheating during the 2-0 loss to Hearts, so how dare he point it out?

Since we’re Celtic fans, we can’t really blame Rodgers for this.

He also isn’t to blame for the problems that came up after these events.

BRENTAN RODGERS HAS DONE WHAT HE NEEDS TO DO.

He told the truth, and he did it in the most professional way possible. He said pretty much what all of us have been thinking.

In a more important sense, what we all really know.

That John Betaon is dishonest.

Not only does he lie, but he is also a wimp who hides behind the SFA’s power.

Being fully aware that no one can touch him.

Since no one can hurt him, he can be as open and honest as he wants when he is judging.

That was clear for everyone to see last Sunday.

As Brendan Rodgers said, VAR makes it easier for referees to watch the game from outside the field of play. It is now clear in Scotland that VAR is being used to hurt us.

That’s not what VAR was made to do.

It is the job of the Video Assistant judge (with “assistant” being the key word) to help the judge.

Rogers made it clear that he is not there to call the game.
He should be called the Video Referee instead of the on-field referee. The on-field referee should be called the Match Assistant Referee.

Because that seems to be how things work based on how Sunday’s game was run.

When it comes to Yang’s high boot on Sunday, Referee Don Robertson made an instant decision and punished the player properly by giving him a yellow card. That should be the end of it.

There should be no reason to go over that event again.

In real time, the match referee has made his choice based on what he has seen.

It will always look a lot worse than it really is when you slow it down and then freeze it.

On the other hand, we all know that the slow motion and freeze frame images were always going to make Don Robertson’s choice very simple.

To put it simply, he and Beaton worked together to get Yang taken off the field of play.

Then they worked together again to make sure Hearts got a penalty.

Not Robertson, but also all 22 players on the field of play and everyone inside Tynecastle missed it totally.

But Beaton, who had sharp eyes, saw it.

Again, he slowed it down a lot for Robertson, who was happy to give Hearts a penalty.

As I said, it was collaboration.

But what makes things even worse for Celtic is that the SFA isn’t quite done screwing us over.
Yang was given a red card, and they were never going to take it back and make it yellow again.

In spite of how stupid the choice was to begin with.

They wouldn’t do that because it would mean they agree with everything Brendan Rodgers said on Sunday.

they were calling the game from outside the field of play.

And they could not possibly say that.

To make their point of view even stronger, they need to now make Brendan Rodgers pay for his actions.

Celtic and the board have said what they normally say about what happened on Sunday.

There were “serious concerns” there.

That’s all there is to it.

Of course, they are “amazed” by how the plea turned out.

I already said it: lip service.

It doesn’t bother them.

BUT THE BIG QUESTION RIGHT NOW IS WHETHER THE SFA WILL BE CRAZY ENOUGH TO GO AFTER RODGERS.
They are taking their time with it.

They are clearly thinking about what other people will be hurt if they go after Rodgers.

If they do decide to charge Rodgers with having bad character, they need to know that they’re giving a lot of room for error.

A lot of people can attack because of what happened after “penalty-gate” last December.

After that, the Ibrox team went after Willie Collum with all guns firing.

There were no punishments planned for them.

It turned out that most of their silly demands were met.

And the SFA decided to meet with them and let them listen in on the VAR call between Collum and Nick Walsh.

In the wake of Sunday’s game, Celtic have asked for nothing of the sort.
The board should have been brave enough to ask to hear what Beaton and Robertson talked about last Sunday.

They don’t throw their toys around like they do at Ibrox, though.

So, the SFA doesn’t scare our club or our board.

What would happen if they decided not to punish Rodgers?

After that, you have to accept that something is wrong in the State of Mount Florida.

Rodgers has been able to tell the truth about how badly stealing is done in the Scottish game.

The SFA will look bad no matter what happens.

But they think that punishing Rodgers is better than nothing.

They would take that chance because they think our board is too weak to tell them they’re wrong.

That view would be reasonable based on what we’ve seen so far from the board about events like this.

The board needs to grow a pair and tell the SFA what they did was wrong if they do punish Rodgers.

In that process, they need to bring up what happened in December of last year.

DO YOU BELIEVE THEY WILL DO THAT?
I don’t trust them because they haven’t shown me any reason to before now.

As I write this, news just came in that Brendan Rodgers has been charged by the SFA;

A letter of complaint has been sent to Rodgers by the SFA’s compliance officer, Martin Black, saying that he has broken Rule 72. Article 96.1. This rule says that people in Scottish football can’t criticize match officials in public in a way that makes them look biased or incompetent or that makes fun of their character.

Rodgers could be banned for two to twenty games.

The result of yesterday’s meeting shows that the board is now getting what they’ve put in so far.

That’s why the SFA turned their noses up at them when it came to the Yang plea.

That’s why they’ll probably look down their noses at them if their charge against Rodgers sticks.

That’s also why people like Beaton think he can’t be hurt.

Because he has never had to worry about what to do.

This is why he keeps pushing the limits.

The best example of this was Sunday.

If our board doesn’t fully defend and fight for Rodgers in this, it will make things even worse between him and them.

If we see this kind of obvious cheating happen again before the season ends, what should we do?

To be honest, I believe Brendan Rodgers should tell his players to leave the field.

Then the SFA and our board might pay attention.

For the simple reason that they wouldn’t want that to go spread.

The world would see the whole broken operation for what it is.
The SFA looks down on us right now, and that’s because our board doesn’t have any guts.

In the same way that they treat Celtic fans badly.

I’ll write more about that in a later post.

They don’t protect us or their players, so if Brendan Rodgers is charged with dishonesty, they better be ready to do so.

Unfortunately, we’re where we are now because they’ve never kept the club safe from the kind of treatment we got last Sunday.

That’s their fault.

The SFA treats us badly because of the Celtic board.

That needs to change, along with a lot of other things.

Brendan Rodgers, the manager of Celtic, is in trouble with the SFA because he harshly criticized the referees after Celtic lost to Hearts.
Brendan Rodgers, the manager of Celtic, is in trouble with the SFA because he harshly criticized the referees after Celtic lost to Hearts.

A letter of complaint has been sent to Rodgers by the SFA’s compliance officer, Martin Black, saying that he has broken Rule 72. Article 96.1. This rule says that people in Scottish football can’t criticize match officials in public in a way that makes them look biased or incompetent or that makes fun of their character. Rodgers could get a 20-game hit-the-field ban.

Rodgers is due to go to a meeting at Hampden on Thursday, March 28. There, he will find out what will happen because of what he said after the game.

CeltsAreHere knows that Celtic will back Rodgers all the way to the top of the hill.







Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending